Home
About SGA
News and
Events
Contact SGA
Join SGA
Speak Out
Donate to
SGA
Links
Search
This Site
Speak Out Archive 2001

Speak Out Archive

City Traffic Consultant should not work for Developers

A letter to the Editor of the Augusta Chronicle, December 22, 2001

Planning Commission needs a more appropriate appointment procedure

A letter to the Editor of the Aiken Standard, December 18, 2001

Changes are needed in selection system for city boards
An Editorial Published in the Aiken Standard December 16, 2001

Council should be more interested in listening
A letter to the Editor of the Aiken Standard, December 12, 2001

Points to consider as you go to the polls for Tuesday's election
Published in the Aiken Standard, September 8, 2001

Aiken Planning Commission not responsive to public input
Published in the Aiken Standard, August 6, 2001

Silver Bluff commercial venture should get another council look
Published in the Aiken Standard, July 18, 2001

Alternatives for proposed hotel
Published in the Aiken Standard, July 18, 2001

City of character?
Published in the Aiken Standard, July 17, 2001

Managed growth needed for the future of our city
Published in the Aiken Standard, July 07, 2001

Was democracy at work at City Council meeting?
Published in the Aiken Standard, July 06, 2001

City Council members incorrect on assessment of county zoning
Published in the Aiken Standard

Aiken City Council fails to see the light
Published in the Aiken Standard

'Rezoning' a hot button issue igniting wildfire reaction
Published in the Aiken Standard, June 27, 2001

Council Disregarded Pleadings of Residents on Annexation
A letter to the Editor of the Aiken Standard

The Traffic Analysis Concerns Ignored in the Woodside Annexation
A letter to the Editor of the Aiken Standard
published June 28, 2001 under the headline
"Traffic impact essential for Aiken's smart growth"

TO: Mayor Fred Cavanaugh and Members of Aiken City Council
RE: Second Reading of Petition for Annexation of Woodside Phase III

...there are critical questions which must be answered by the City Council before completing the annexation

For your consideration: An Important statement re: Woodside Phase III
SGA is not against the annexation of the Woodside Development Phase III land, as long as it done smartly and with complete consideration being given to the impact of the development on the community.

The Need for Regional Planning
a report on the Comprehensive Land Use and Traffic Plan by Barbara Nelson

© 2001-2005 Smart Growth Aiken
Skart Designs